Supporters of the Sage homeschool program gather outside the Boulder municipal building on May 1, 2025 after speaking to city council. Credit: Jenna Sampson

Update at 4:20 p.m. on May 13, 2025: This story has been updated to include comments from the Sage Program’s former coordinator.

Dozens of families packed Boulder City Council chambers on May 1 in support of a homeschool program called Sage Programs that had operated quietly for decades but recently shut down after being flagged for code violations.

The city said it received two complaints in February from community members raising concerns about unsafe, unpermitted buildings and the operation of an unlicensed school. In response, the city visited the site and confirmed the violations. Sage then voluntarily closed its doors, leaving 30 families to scramble for another option mid-school year, and launched a GoFundMe that has raised over $34,000.

Supporters say Sage is more of a spiritual nature-based community than a formal school and therefore it wouldn’t be appropriate to become licensed. The city disagrees, citing safety concerns for kids and the fact that some programs ran Monday through Thursday, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m., as evidence it functioned as a school and must be licensed in order to continue operating.

But concerns about Sage go beyond building safety, and its closure is drawing new attention to a loosely regulated corner of Colorado’s education landscape — where families pursue models that fall outside the bounds of traditional oversight.

One of the complaints came from Jules McDougal, a former Sage teacher whose contract was not renewed after a year teaching first grade there because of a mismatch in views on teaching. She said the program wanted someone who would focus more on the arts, while McDougal thought students were not getting enough required curriculum.

Sage Hamilton, founder of the program, believes in the power of imaginative play — a Waldorf-inspired view — and has built the program around that.

McDougal said that the emphasis on imaginative play went too far, at the expense of academic instruction — claiming students received only about an hour of structured learning out of the six hours they were on site. She also said she was concerned about the physical safety of the children on site and kept raising concerns she said were brushed off.

But the most serious concern, she told Boulder Reporting Lab, involved a report of child abuse that was not mentioned in the city complaint. In spring 2021, McDougal said staff were told that a young girl at the program had been sexually abused by her mother’s boyfriend. She said she was advised not to report it, under the belief that involving authorities would not be in the child’s best interest or the best interest of the program, which she said wanted to avoid attention.

“They were adamant that I shouldn’t report it,” she alleged.

Hamilton strongly disputes this, saying that when the mother came to them with this information, the mother had already reported it to authorities. She said she recalls the family working with a court-appointed therapist.

Leila Talore Gass, Sage’s program coordinator from 2019 to 2025, also disputed McDougal’s account. She said the child was already under the care of Child Protective Services when she joined the program and that no one discouraged McDougal from reporting again. Gass said staff were focused on supporting the family, adding that McDougal’s comments appeared to stem from frustration after her contract was not renewed.

Both public and private school teachers and childcare providers are mandated reporters, even in cases where they are told a report has already been made.

McDougal said she reported it anyway — but said she struggled with the idea that others might not have. While this happened about a year prior to her leaving the program, she said the incident caused a rift when she told Hamilton she had reported it. At the time, she was an assistant kindergarten teacher in training. Hamilton disputes that a rift occurred.

A tall fence and plenty of freedom

Sage is a nonprofit founded by Hamilton and her partner, Christopher Sassano, almost 30 years ago. The two live on a large residential property in rural North Boulder, where they hosted daily programming for around 30 children ranging from pre-K to third grade.

They also ran mentorship programs, summer camps and hosted ceremonies on the land.

Supporters of Sage describe the property as a sanctuary — a nature-based alternative to traditional school. Hamilton, who once taught at Shining Mountain Waldorf School, said she left because she was disillusioned with indoor, structured learning.

“I got tired of seeing kids [sitting] at a box in a box,” said Hamilton in an interview.

Sassano has a background in biodynamic farming and led daily lessons in the garden. Hamilton described the program as “Waldorf-inspired” and spiritual. They aren’t contesting the city’s citations but maintain they are not operating a school and don’t intend to seek licensing to become one.

“My husband and I put up a fence and just did exactly what we wanted behind that fence,” she said. “The city is in its rightful place.”

Several parents who attended the council meeting described Sage as a rare and meaningful alternative to traditional education.

“Children feel at home and deeply nurtured by the people that bring this rich nature experience to children,” said Abel Villacorta, a parent who spoke at the meeting.

Supporters had planned to sing during public comment at the meeting but weren’t allowed. Afterward, Aiyana Rutherford, daughter of the Sage founders, gathered the group of at least 50 supporters outside the municipal building to sing a song.

“Well here we are gathered on the side of the road,” she said. “It’s a lot different than being at the shire.”

According to tax filings, Rutherford became the organization’s treasurer in 2022-23, the same year Gateway Apprenticeship Program — the nonprofit behind Sage — reported a jump in revenue from under $200,000 in 2021 to over $1 million, following a grant from an anonymous family fund. In 2023, the nonprofit purchased the neighboring property for $3 million.

Supporters of the Sage homeschool program, Jake Plummer (left) and Autumn Grinath (right), attend the Boulder City Council meeting on May 1, 2025. Credit: Jenna Sampson

Oversight questions and blurred boundaries

It’s unclear whether all Sage families formally registered their children as homeschoolers with the Boulder Valley School District, as required by state law. Parents who homeschool must submit an “intent to homeschool” form and are legally responsible for providing instruction in core subjects for at least four hours a day over 172 days a year.

Because Sage operated as an unlicensed program, it wasn’t required to track attendance or follow a curriculum — leaving the responsibility for meeting state standards on parents. Whether those basic instruction requirements were met for students above pre-K remains unclear. Hamilton said the program lacks formal grades or curriculum and is instead built around intuition and community needs.

“We don’t have grades, we don’t have curriculum guides,” she said. “What we have is trying to be heartfelt and listen to what the community of people who come to us need.”

However, the website does require parents to choose a grade level during registration.

She also said the program shouldn’t be labeled a school due to the constraints that would come with licensing, such as fencing the pond or banning the use of sharp gardening tools. She suggested it might be closer to a church.

“If you think about it, it starts almost sounding like a religion. We’re almost pagan. If we went down that road we could have a lot of freedom,” she said.

According to Brad Mueller, Boulder’s director of planning and development services, the city has offered to help Sage in submitting an application to operate as a private school, which could be processed while they address the building code violations. Hamilton has indicated they’ll pass on that offer, but may go the route of becoming one of the first licensed outdoor preschools in the state.

City inspectors documented a number of unpermitted and potentially unsafe structures on the Sage property, including an accessory dwelling unit built inside a barn, a partially finished shed with electrical work, a greenhouse attached to the main house and a deck lacking required guardrails and handrails. A large yurt with a support platform, also built without permits, is being removed and sold, Mueller said.

Inspectors also noted a high risk of fire due to multiple stacks of improperly stored materials across the property. In addition, several play structures may not meet the safety standards required for licensed schools. City staff are now working with the State Licensing Agency to determine whether further action will be taken, according to Mueller.

Hamilton acknowledged some of those risks but said she believes the emphasis on safety is overly restrictive, saying kids should be allowed to be more free.

“There’s this mentality around being safe. You have to protect yourself from all the bad things,” she said. “You buy life insurance and bet on something bad happening to you.”

McDougal said safety was a concern in part because she said the program would try to avoid scrutiny from the outside world and fly under the radar — something she believes contributed to issues being overlooked. In an incident that happened in her class, she said, a candle was lit during part of the day and a boy accidentally set a a container of unlit matches on fire, badly burning his hand. His parents took him to the hospital. Hamilton and Rutherford vehemently denied this version of events.

Hamilton said they have homeowners insurance that would cover incidents on the property, and that they care deeply for the family whose son was burned. She said he was the third child of that family to attend the program and they made sure to stay in touch as he was healing.

Since closing, some children from Sage have begun attending Shining Mountain or Boulder Valley Waldorf, while others are staying home in hopes the program reopens.

A new era for alternative choice

Homeschooling has been legal in Colorado since 1992, following a decades-long push by parents who believed early formal education was stifling. Today, families turn to homeschooling for many reasons — from special needs and bullying to religious values and pandemic-era concerns.

In 2024, Gov. Jared Polis signed a bill allowing outdoor “forest schools” to operate as licensed childcare centers under the Department of Early Childhood — a move seen as legitimizing nature-based learning. Meanwhile, 15% of Colorado’s public schools are charters — one of the highest rates in the country — and at least 10 states, including Texas, now offer voucher programs to fund private or home-based education. Colorado declined to pass a similar amendment last year, though advocacy groups continue pushing for it.

While the state supports school choice through its charter and licensed homeschool options, Sage’s closure highlights a gray area — where some families seek even less structure and oversight.

BVSD currently has about 400 registered homeschool students, though it’s unknown how many others are unregistered. According to BVSD communications director Randy Barber, BVSD has less coordination with homeschool families than other districts.

Declining enrollment across BVSD affects the district’s overall budget. If the rise in alternative education options continues, it could accelerate that trend, driving up the cost per student.

Clarification, May 13, 2025 4:32 pm:

An earlier version of this story, in the section about an incident in McDougal’s classroom, referred to the object as a matchbox; it was a container of unlit matches. Hamilton and Rutherford strongly disputed McDougal’s account of the incident.

Correction, May 12, 2025 3:58 pm:

An earlier version of this story misstated the program’s hours. Some Sage programs ran from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m., not 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

Jenna Sampson is a freelance journalist in Boulder, Colorado. When not dabbling in boat building or rock climbing you can find her nursing an iced coffee in front of a good book. Email: jsampson@fastmail.com.

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. I understand why people might want to educate their own children, however they see fit; but both infringing on the public education system and deciding you’re qualified to school other peoples children then do so well outside out of licensing as well as basic laws like zoning/building codes….well that’s just wildly illegal and underlines how foolishly-entitled folks who promote nontraditional learning environments think ANY rules don’t apply to them.

    1. The families who sent their kids to this program did so willingly. They thought the people who were running this program were capable of teaching their kids. They were also aware of the facility and it’s buildings. It’s really not anyone else’s business to decide if the people running the program were qualified to do so.

  2. “Sacred Community deserves Immunity” are you kidding? Immunity from safety? We are talking about children here! And who were the individuals holding these signs? Don’t you name your ‘sources’? This article was disturbing, and the costs of “homeschooling” referred to at the end almost felt like you buried the lead…not quite, but…

    1. The individuals holding the signs are named in the photo caption.

    2. Another example of state overreach. Parents are responsible for homeschooling their children. If they want to use a nature co-op or whatever, they can and that program isn’t required to be a school. All the comments of “we don’t know if children are properly registered ” is just journalistic license to make something sound much worse than it is. It means, every child could absolutely be receiving a great education, but we didn’t chose to look into that particular area. This former teacher sounds like they are upset because they weren’t kept on staff.
      Every safety concern could have been addressed without stopping the program and every child’s education is supposed to be supplemented at home, anyway. You know, because they’re homeschooling. Sounds like a lot of politics and while accidents are terrible, what school has closed completely because of an active shooter incident? I think that’s a much greater safety risk but hey, this program isn’t beneficial to the government, so it must be a problem.

  3. As a parent of two children in this program – there are some inaccuracies in the reporting here:

    Sage Programs ran from 9-2 daily. At least half of the children were only there 3 days. It was a homeschool enrichment program, not meant to substitute a full academic program – a place where children could learn to be in harmony with each other and the Earth – something that is not taught in most traditional schools.

    It is ironic that Jules would cite the child whose hand was burned as a safety concern, because it was in her class, under her supervision that this occured. This was one of many reasons that her contract was not renewed. Her reporting of this program was malicious, a retribution for not being renewed as a teacher.

    And to the above comment – I would like to say – public school was not an option for my 5 year old. Assuming you understand the motivations and needs of every family in this program and writing us all off as entitled is dangerous. For my son, his time at Sage Programs was truly healing for him – a gift he couldn’t have gotten anywhere else. He is now a strong, confident kid – ready to enter traditional schooling.

    What I’m trying to say is this – why shouldn’t parents be able to choose social/learning environments for their children? Why shouldn’t parents be able to discern what is safe for their children? No parent at Sage Programs dropped their child off without fully vetting the property and staff – and the program ran safely for 30 years with no injuries, accidents or complaints. In 2008, the city visited the property and gave the program and all its buildings a greenlight to continue as a homeschool enrichment program. In my opinion, having spent a lot of time at the property, the safety concerns being cited in the complaint and by the city here are grossly exaggerated.

    The way forward – to become a licensed private school that the city has offered Sage Programs – would cost upwards of $1 million dollars and take years to complete. Undertaking these coats would fundamentally change what the program is able to offer as a small, community-knit place. The closure of the program is already threatening to bankrupt two elderly citizens who have been serving families in Boulder for over 30 years.

    These small, nature-based programs are being shut down all over Boulder County. Sage Programs is not alone. None of them can function in the bureaucratic frameworks that currently exist. The loss of each of these programs is a loss for the community as a whole.

    Finally, this program is not a threat to BVSD enrollment – nearly all the families are switching to private schools. If there is true concern about declining enrollment in BVSD – affordability in Boulder County must be addressed. Small homeschool programs are not the source of this declining enrollment.

    I believe that BVSD is an excellent, innovative public school system precisely because of educators like Sage Hamilton that have for decades changed our thinking about children and what helps them thrive – challenging norm and rules about education to create new possibilities – these are the same ideas that were behind the founding of New Vista High School, BCSIS & Horizons K-8. We should be supporting and uplifting innovative educators with alternative models as incubators for new ideas that may eventually be adopted by the traditional school system. The current bureaucratic system all but ensures that they will all cease to exist within 5 years – a loss of educational diversity that will negatively impact the educational landscape here in Boulder.

    1. Editor’s note: Thank you for sharing your perspective. We’ve clarified the program hours and issued a correction.

      On other points raised: The city confirmed code violations, and the program’s decision to shut down followed that. Sage leaders did not indicate that the burn incident was connected to the teacher’s contract and initially told us there had been no safety incidents. Our reporting did not assign blame but sought to raise questions about communication and oversight, based on information from sources. The city’s planning director also noted “full-day classes (regular school year listed, as well as summer programs), multiple teachers, multiple grade levels being taught, and tuition charges.”

      As for the $1 million licensing figure, we have not seen documentation supporting that number. It may reflect the estimated cost of bringing the property up to code — which could be necessary regardless of licensing requirements.

      1. The leaders of Sage Programs have been very careful to not say anything negative about Jules or to implicate her in any negative way – which speaks only to their incredible integrity in the face of immense hardship.

        It is common in home-school programs to have multi-age groups, and that there would be compensation for teachers and mentors is a given.

        I don’t know the specifics of the cost of licensing – but it is immense – in terms of the amount of hours and legal counsel and administrative staff required. The staff at Sage Programs have been working tirelessly on this for no pay since February. The only reason we came to City Council was because it was becoming increasingly clear that there was no way forward within the existing frameworks that wouldn’t fundamentally alter or extinguish the program.

  4. As a parent who child attended 2 years of preschool in this program, and who based on this experience have only wonderful things to say about this program. I am saddened at the lack of well rounded reporting in this article. It is parents who should have the freedom to decide what kind of education, curriculum and ensuing risks they wish their child to be experienced in. The state/ city needs a regulatory framework to support parents choosing for their children and have measures where there is an absence of parental involvement and care. Over- regulation is the problem in this instance where a valuable community program has run for 30 years with any challenges tended to with extreme thought and care. Even their neighbors are supportive of Sage and Christopher.

  5. Sounds like some old school Hippy stuff to me. Very odd that a place like boulder should care. The only Anti Vax folks I’d ever met were hard core pray it away types and…? Hard core pray to Buddha and Mother Earth Hippies.

    The similarities are astounding to me, both want a lack of government oversight and “freedom.” Both are constantly harassed by “progressive intellectuals” who always seem to know best.

    Prohibition was a product of? Progressives.

    Modern safety regulations? Progressives.

    The ability of people to label themselves Progressives gives one a broad reach on the ways they can inject themselves into other people’s lives.

    But it’s always “for their own good.” Isn’t it? Red tape and red ink written in blood and all that.

    This starts to become a slippery slope quite quickly. When does care and concern become overreach and meddling? When are we not allowing these people to practice their culture? Their beliefs?

    Why should they submit to our traditional education system and all of its acknowledged flaws? Sounds like the boarding schools natives were sent to.

    “We can’t allow these morons to screw up these kids. We have to stop them. We know better. It’s our divine right. Our duty.” Because that’s what I’m getting out of all of this.

    Isn’t this a form of resistance? And isn’t resistance a good thing?

    I grew up in this liberal “question the questions and be suspicious of everyone and eveything” era and this doesn’t pass the smell test, let alone the “do the math” part.

  6. If the parents think that this is better than the public school system, they should be allowed to use it.

  7. I have known Sage and Christopher since I was a little girl. They have always been so kind and nurturing, both shining examples of how human beings can truly be in the world.

    I grew up going to Shining Mountain Waldorf School, where Christopher was the groundskeeper and Sage was a class teacher. Later, as an adult, when I began to teach at Shining Mountain, I would take my classes to walk over to Sage programs to enjoy their nurturing and nature filled property and to watch their artistic and culturally enriching plays. Then, later still, when I had my own young children, I placed them in Sage Programs, because it was the best homeschool enrichment program I could offer them. Please consider helping Sage Programs continue into the future. It is a rare gem in our community.

    Sincerely,

    ~Venus Faye (Boulder native, Waldorf teacher, and parent.)

  8. I was lead teacher at a similar program for children in Delta County. The one-room school house I led offered a teaching model called Constructivism, and our students were those children who either didn’t fit into the brick-and-mortar philosophy of public education or whose parents saw an opportunity for their children to learn how to create learning that was meaningful for them, in a style that fit their needs. Delta School District came up with a fantastic district model for home school families to engage in their public schools in ways that afforded their children the freedom to choose a pedagogy that was more of a bottom-up style, not the top-down style of mainstream education. BTW, I have been licensed to teach in CO since 1991, and have done so in a variety of schools. My style of teaching didn’t fit into mainstream public school processes and procedures due to the emphasis on top-down learning and limited pedagogies approved by the districts I taught in.

Leave a comment
Boulder Reporting Lab comments policy
All comments require an editor's review. BRL reserves the right to delete or turn off comments at any time. Please read our comments policy before commenting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *