The South Boulder rec center, a 50-year-old community hub, has been deteriorating for years. If the aging boiler that heats the pool fails again, the pool will close permanently, Credit: Brooke Stephenson

Ryan Bennett, his wife Yvonne and their three kids live just a short walk from the South Boulder Recreation Center — a place they use so often that Ryan jokes they’re likely on the “power user list.”

But their go-to spot is now in jeopardy. The City of Boulder recently announced that the aging rec center is nearing the end of its life and could face sudden closure unless a replacement plan is developed.

Now, the family is helping lead Reimagine South Boulder Rec Center, a growing group of nearly 200 people that formed in just a few weeks. They’re working with the city to push for a new rec center while ensuring the current one stays open until it’s replaced.

“There’s unbelievable passion and so many amazing stories of the impact that the rec center has had in this community,” Bennett said. Reimagine “brought a ton of really passionate, energized people together.”

The group is also raising awareness. On Nov. 18, Yvonne Castillo, another member of Reimagine South Boulder Rec Center, told the city’s Parks and Recreation Advisory Board that every time she swims, she approaches people in the hot tub to ask if they know the pool could close. “Inevitably, 99% of the time, I have blank faces looking at me,” Castillo said. “So there are a lot of people in the community that use the pool on a daily basis and don’t know anything about what’s going on.”

The South Boulder rec center, built 50 years ago, has been deteriorating for years. A boiler has already failed once, flooding the gym, and the boiler that heats the pool still needs to be replaced. If it fails again, the pool will close for good. The sewer system also has issues, and if it fails, the entire rec center will shut down.

The deteriorating rec center highlights a larger issue for Boulder: Deferred maintenance on aging buildings and infrastructure is catching up with the city, and the timing couldn’t be worse. With rising costs and stagnant sales tax revenues squeezing the budget, the city faces tough decisions about how to address mounting repair needs while balancing other priorities.

City officials say major repairs and renovations at the South Boulder Rec Center aren’t feasible due to its age and condition. A 2016 assessment projected the center would reach the end of its life by 2026, and replacing it would cost tens of millions of dollars — funds the city doesn’t currently have.

A 2025 ballot measure could help fund a new rec center by allowing the city to increase its debt through bonds. Ali Rhodes, director of Boulder’s Parks and Recreation Department, said the city might also consider using the bonds to address deferred maintenance for public safety, transportation and parks.

“There is almost always polling to get a general and statistically valid input from the community as to what things people are feeling an appetite for,” Rhodes said. “Generally, you don’t put something on the ballot if it’s not polling above 55%.”

If there’s sufficient interest, Rhodes expects potential ballot measure language to go to the city council by May or June 2025. However, city officials won’t have detailed cost estimates by then, meaning council members will have to decide whether to proceed immediately or wait until 2026 for more precise numbers.

At the Nov. 18 meeting, several members of Reimagine South Boulder Rec Center said they’re ready to support outreach for bonds or other funding measures.

“I, too, would be very happy to do whatever community building it would take to raise the bonds to keep the rec center as it is, with a pool,” said Irene Lee, a South Boulder resident of 16 years. “We all have to understand that the rec center is not a money-making business. It costs a lot of money to fund and run and maintain, and it is worth it, because it provides a really priceless resource to our communities.” Lee’s sons, 11 and 14, grew up swimming and playing at the rec center and now walk there on their own. 

Several speakers said they had moved to South Boulder partly because of the rec center. Many were parents, and some children and teens also spoke.

Jimmie Connolly, 21, who worked as a lifeguard at the rec center for five years, recalled opening the pool one winter morning to find regular swimmers bundled up and waiting outside. “As I let them in, they shared stories about how they’d formed lifelong friendships in that very pool, meeting each morning to swim laps and support one another,” he said. 

Ryan Bennett said he had always assumed the rec center would be there. “When some of this stuff came up, it started to make myself and my wife realize, ‘Wow, you can’t take this for granted,’” he said. “So we need to organize and ensure that the community has its voice heard.”

Would a new South Boulder rec center include a pool?

Reimagine South Boulder Rec Center has quickly become a partner in the city’s Future of Recreation Centers project.

The group participated in a meeting with city officials and community organizations and will join a Jan. 15 “game night” workshop to provide input on Boulder’s three rec centers, including South Boulder’s facility.

Interactive posters will also be displayed in the rec center at the end of January to gather additional feedback before the engagement period closes.

Working with Denver-based Perkins&Will, city officials plan to present designs by spring 2025 to guide ballot measure discussions. These will include high-level concepts for South Boulder’s facility and detailed plans for East Boulder Recreation Center renovations, already funded through the Community, Culture, Resilience and Safety Sales and Use Tax

One key debate is whether a pool will be part of South Boulder’s future. Members of Reimagine advocate for including a pool, whether through renovations — a costly option the city would consider if the community supports it — or in a new facility.

“We’ve got a big hole in the ground already,” said Yvonne Castillo.

Deryn Wagner, Boulder’s senior landscape architect, explained that structural challenges make it difficult to keep the pool in its current location, which sits on lower ground than Viele Lake, directly south of the building.

“All of the water that is around that pool and the foundation of the building is making it weak,” Wagner said. This issue has plagued the facility since it was built, driving up maintenance costs. If the community wants to keep a pool in that area, she said, it might need to be relocated to another part of the site.

Ryan Bennett said initial confusion about the rec center’s future has eased, describing discussions with city leaders as positive. “The question is now: ‘What does that look like?’” he said. “I think that’s the fun and exciting work to do.”

Correction: A previous version of the story reported that the boiler that heats the pool failed and flooded the gym. A separate boiler that does not heat the pool flooded the gym.

Brooke Stephenson is a reporter for Boulder Reporting Lab, where she covers local government, housing, transportation, policing and more. Previously, she worked at ProPublica, and her reporting has been published by Carolina Public Press and Trail Runner Magazine. Most recently, she was the audience and engagement editor at Cardinal News, a nonprofit covering Southwest and Southside Virginia. Email: brooke@boulderreportinglab.org.

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

  1. It’s lucky prior generations built buildings that lasted longer than 50 years, or we’d be missing the Hotel Boulderado, the county courthouse, many buildings downtown and a good number our houses.

    1. A hotel is not a rec center, heavily used building such as schools should not expect to last 50 years without major renovation. Most CU buildings have been gutted and rebuilt.
      This is easy, build a new rec center, this is probably 80 to 90 percent support in the city. But asking for the current one to remain open during rebuild seems like an over-reach.

      1. I missed that, is this new group asking that the current facility remain open during construction if a new facility is built?

        Has the City of Boulder had deferred maintenance funds accumulating for its facilities historically? What new municipal construction is currently planned? Is a plan for long-term maintenance/renovation of those facilities in place?

        How was the determination made regarding which Boulder recreation facilities would be funded through the Community, Culture, Resilience and Safety Sales and Use Tax?

        As I read the article these questions came to mind.

  2. That the SBRC has not been properly maintained is utterly ridiculous. That money has not been put aside for necessary replacements is totally irresponsible.
    The City of Boulder’s budget has increased almost 50% on a per capita, inflation adjusted basis over the last approx. 20 years. Where did all that money go?
    The city councils have not taken responsibility to keep things up, and have failed to plan financially for future reinvestments to maintain levels of service. That is their fundamental job, not social policy, as the current “progressives” seem to think.
    I served 10 years on the city council (1985-93 and 1995-97), and I am appalled. Throw the whole bunch out and get some responsible people in office.

  3. Boulder spent $23M in lawyer fees in a failed attempt to start a municipal electric company. Think they could find some money for a popular rec center?

  4. If the pool closes, so many swimmers from South Boulder are going to have to get into a car to access East or North. Do we really need more traffic congestion in Boulder? We definitely can’t afford more greenhouse gas emissions from the increased driving. And how about the seniors who shouldn’t be driving? or the teens from Southern Hills and Fairview who can currently walk there and maintain independence?

  5. No g lovell. That was money well spent. And the savings under Municipalization would have improved economic conditions facing the city so that they could direct funding for maintenance for a SB pool that could have lasted many more years, but is now having to be replaced.

    However a lawsuit against the FAA regarding the Airport to develop housing will only deplete the budget while enriching the developer and sticking the bill for the impacts with the resident.

  6. It’s absurd on the face of it. What kind of a city closes a recreation center because they can’t afford maintenance? This is a long time coming consequence of massive inflation due to private equity investment over the past 20 years in every sector imaginable. This is why all real estate costs for businesses and residential have skyrocketed. When costs rise due to greatly increased corporate profit, it affects everyone sooner or later. This wasn’t a problem 50 years ago before deregulation of financial investment in every aspect of life. But all this is beyond the pay grade of city staff and council. Now we just suffer all the consequences.

  7. Is there a source for more information on either the Jan 15 workshop for rec center input, or on the Reimagining South Boulder Rec Center group? This article is the only place online I am seeing either one mentioned.

  8. It is so crazy how badly built structures are in this country.

    The principle problem here seems to entirely stem from terrible building and design standards as well as a lack of ability to do maintenance.

    It is infuriating because humans can clearly build and maintain structures for long periods of time if they are built to last but also people care enough to maintain them.

    There is a serious rot at play here that goes deeper than monetary issues.

Leave a comment
Boulder Reporting Lab comments policy
All comments require an editor's review. BRL reserves the right to delete or turn off comments at any time. Please read our comments policy before commenting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *