This commentary is by Aquiles La Grave, a Boulder resident and a leader in the Save Iris coalition. On Nov. 12, Boulder County officials posted a staff recommendation backing The Academy’s $26 million proposal, developed with the Save Iris coalition, which would preserve the Iris ballfields as part of the county’s sale of the property while adding senior housing on the rest of the site.
If you’re reading this for another nostalgia pitch about saving Iris Fields, kindly move on. Saving Iris Fields matters, sure, but what’s transformational isn’t the fields. It’s the blueprint we created for community agency in Boulder.
The official narratives are often a poor reflection of what actually happens. They would have you believe the fate of public land gets written in board rooms, by staff, elected officials or developers. My experience, and that of the parties and neighbors I worked with to bring about the preservation of Iris Fields, is proof that you don’t have to accept the window-dressing version of “public comment period.” You can design the process as much as the outcome.
For months, I’ve operated behind the curtain. As a first-generation immigrant who came to Boulder as a teen in the 90s, I had a built-in advantage, perspective. When I received the phone call late one evening earlier this year that spurred me into action, I already knew I was entering a system that expected me to stay in my lane, keep quiet, embrace my own insignificance and let others decide.
Any effort to preserve acreage in the heart of Boulder, though well-meaning, stood between a developer and his payout. As Boulder Reporting Lab later exposed, deals had circled, incentives had moved people away from community interests, and the machinery of local politics had positioned Boulder’s public goods for private gain. The fields would disappear, not through negligence, but quiet calculation.
That’s why I chose to break the script.
I didn’t wait for permission or comment. I reached out, built alliances and aligned public and private incentives to the public good, triggering an unsolicited proposal backed by a coalition of neighbors, HOAs, Little League parents, and forced the county to respond to us. People who, like me, refused to let process leave us behind. We didn’t just add ourselves to the agenda. We forced the issue, flipping the table and making institutional actors react to community consensus. Along the way, many tried to slow us or tried to divide us, but they never caught up. Every move was driven by transparency and a stubborn refusal to let Boulder’s core values be replaced by outsized payouts and polished resumes.
I recognized the risk of standing even partially behind a developer: misalignment, backroom whispers, the temptation to shade the truth. But I’ve insisted that the only way forward was, is and will remain in the open: recorded meetings, public documentation, inviting dissidents instead of dismissing them and making strategy visible to all.
That’s not just the story of Iris Fields. It’s Boulder’s story, and one that some reminded me of along the way. This city was shaped by residents who drew the Blue Line, launched open space votes and made citizen action the norm, not the exception. We would be losing our identity by failing to recognize that agency here isn’t given, it’s taken — by organizing, disrupting and designing outcomes from the ground up.
To save Iris Fields, we started hyperlocal. Late-night calls. Impromptu meetings. Cross-pollinating HOAs, parents, longtime residents and skeptical development partners. We refused to wait for agendas that never came or that gave us few opportunities to speak. We shaped a proposal before any other developer, before staff circulated options, before officials had a clue that consensus was already built.
Transparency was our foundation. We recruited new voices even when it made things messier. When momentum faltered or politics worked against us, documentation and open communication pushed the needle.
The real lesson here is that agency is learned by practice. Many involved didn’t start out as seasoned civic operators. They became them by necessity. Setbacks were frequent. We pivoted when county priorities changed, expanded our tent when factions clashed, and made room for debate without forfeiting unity. The development and land-use system wasn’t built for resident-led projects, so we built the process ourselves.
Winning isn’t ever guaranteed. Rival giant bids, county skepticism, staff resistance and developer pressure have threatened this outcome at every step. What held the coalition together was not outrage, but the discipline to leverage Boulder’s greatest assets: committed neighbors willing to do the unglamorous work of designing outcomes from the ground up, simply for the belief in each other and a better future.
To replicate this outcome, we must forget the playbook where “public process” means showing up late in the game, meeting a fate already sealed. We must not be afraid to get messy and let truth win out. We can initiate, not just react. We proved that again in Boulder. The deeper lesson here, for Iris Fields and every fight to come, is that when citizens claim agency, define success and build their own coalitions, the possibilities multiply.
I’m sharing this now because if we want Boulder to stay remarkable, we can’t settle for influencing outcomes. We must insist on designing them. Agency isn’t something granted by either the county commissioners or city council agenda. It’s something seized by standing up, organizing, and refusing to work in the margins.
Iris Fields was my laboratory for that idea. Its design should travel, reforming how we decide every meaningful asset in Boulder’s future.
Now, as the decision looms, I step forward. Civic change always needs someone to break the silence. If you want Boulder to remain Boulder, don’t wait for permission. Stand up, speak out, align with your core and insist that the blueprint belongs to those who live here.
That’s how we’ve saved Iris Fields. That’s how we’ll safeguard Boulder’s future.


I completely agree. As an “old” and longtime resident of Boulder, I was thrilled to see a younger member of the community step up and recognize Boulder’s value in its history and citizen strength. The outcome was a collaboration across the city. I appreciate the action taken by Aquiles and the other neighbors involved. We should always remember who we are and hope always be. Thanks for another generation in Boulder to carry on the tradition for the benefit of all.
Thank you! We saw a similar dynamic in South Boulder when the future of the South Boulder Rec Center was questioned. The community organized, made their priorities known and had an impact on decision-making. The group continues to work together to rethink how our shared community space can be designed to cultivate community.
Extremely grateful to have such an engaged, disciplined, & innovative process develop. Despite my support of the outcome, the actions & commitments of Aquiles, and others are laudable & repeatable. A similar movement maybe applicable to the Boulder Airport issue. Rather than being “for” or “against” two options (closure & development vs status quo airport operations) creating a new vision for those 174 acres by 2040 & beyond May be worthwhile. Standing ovation to all of you who emulate true citizenship!