Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, at the Capitol in Washington, March 27, 2026. Credit: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

This story was updated at 8 p.m. on May 21 to include additional comments from Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty.

The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary has requested records and information from Boulder County and the City of Boulder about their sanctuary city immigration policies, alleging that Boulder is endangering communities by refusing to cooperate with immigration enforcement.

The committee’s chairman, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, issued letters on May 20 to Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty, County Sheriff Curtis Johnson and Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn. Other sanctuary cities, including Denver, Philadelphia and Arlington, Virginia, have received similar requests for information in recent weeks. The committee says the letters are part of its oversight of federal immigration policies and that Boulder’s response will “inform potential legislative reforms to address sanctuary policies.”

In a statement, Dougherty called the letter “political theater that ignores serious failures within the federal immigration system.”

“The idea that people in Congress are wasting their time, and now my time, by reviewing what we’re doing at a local level when immigration at the federal level has been so dysfunctional for so long is laughable to me,” Dougherty told Boulder Reporting Lab.

The City of Boulder declared itself a sanctuary city after Trump took office in 2017. The ordinance states that city employees, including police, will not cooperate with federal authorities to investigate a person’s immigration status, and that city resources will not be used to detain anyone based on their suspected immigration status. The county has similar policies.

The letters from the congressional committee requested internal documents and communications related to officials’ interactions with ICE, prosecutions of “non-U.S. citizens,” Know Your Rights trainings on how to interact with ICE, and the number of ICE detainers each law enforcement agency has declined, according to Dougherty’s letter and Colorado Politics.

The letter asked Boulder officials to provide responses by June 3.

Boulder’s sanctuary city policy

Boulder’s ordinance states that undocumented people pay taxes and are therefore entitled to city services, like police and firefighting services, public libraries and rec centers, but may choose not to do so out of fear that local officials will cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The sanctuary city policy is intended to address this concern.

Sheriff Johnson has said that county officers will not enforce federal immigration laws and do not actively share information with ICE about individuals in the Boulder County Jail for similar reasons.

In March, a federal judge ruled that the federal government cannot compel localities to enforce immigration laws, dismissing a case from the Department of Justice against the City of Denver over its immigration policies.

“State implementation and enforcement of the federal immigration scheme is necessarily voluntary,” Judge Gordon P. Gallagher wrote in his ruling. “Federal law permits the federal government to contract with state and local governments to further federal immigration enforcement, but does not require such.”

District Attorney’s policies and response

Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty addresses demonstrators at the No Kings protest in downtown Boulder on June 14, 2025. Credit: Cailean Albert

In its letter to Dougherty, the committee called out specific DA policies that it claimed gave “preferential treatment to aliens.” Those included the DA’s willingness to move court dates for defendants who fear immigration officials could use those appearances to locate them; Dougherty’s suggestion that Flock, an automatic license plate reader company, restrict ICE’s access; and the fact that his office considers immigration status when sentencing some non-violent crimes. 

The congressional committee objected to this practice, saying the policies “aim to shield criminal aliens from accountability and ultimately imperil Colorado communities.” 

“Under your office’s pro-crime, pro-illegal immigration policies, illegal alien criminals areallowed to freely operate, terrorize local communities, and reoffend without consequences,” the letter reads.

Earlier this year, in response to an aggressive campaign to detain and deport immigrants in Minneapolis, Dougherty also reissued guidance about how to respond to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, telling residents to call the police if ICE agents try to enter their homes without a warrant. Both the Boulder Police Department and the Boulder County Sheriff’s Office confirmed they would respond to those calls.

In a press release, the DA’s office said it “prosecutes violent criminals regardless of immigration status and follows Colorado law while prioritizing public safety.”

Dougherty said some of the policies criticized by the committee are intended to ensure criminal cases can still move forward and that defendants face consequences in Colorado courts.

“We currently have cases where ICE is swooping in and picking up people and deporting them without any notice to our office and disrupting criminal prosecutions,” Dougherty told Boulder Reporting Lab, arguing that if someone is deported before a case has concluded they don’t face appropriate prison time for serious crimes.

He said his office considers immigration status when sentencing low-level crimes “because my commitment is to public safety and justice for the people of Colorado, not engaging in federal immigration enforcement.”

For example, “years ago, when someone was sentenced to one year in jail, that sentence could trigger deportation,” he said. “ I helped lead an effort to get the maximum sentence reduced to 364 days, so the people of Colorado still get that one year jail sentence, but it doesn’t carry with it the immigration consequences.”

Dougherty also argued that federal failures contributed to the June 1, 2025 firebombing attack on Pearl Street. Prosecutors said Mohamed Soliman used Molotov cocktails and incendiary devices to attack demonstrators calling for the release of Israeli hostages before later pleading guilty in state court to murder and dozens of other charges.

“Federal systems failed to stop the firebomber before innocent people were harmed, even when his attempted purchase of a firearm was denied due to his immigration status,” he said. “After the attack, I worked with our law enforcement partners, fought for the victims, and secured justice.”

Boulder police near the intersection of 15th and Pine this April. Credit: Boulder Reporting Lab
Boulder police near the intersection of 15th and Pine streets. Credit: Boulder Reporting Lab

The Boulder Police and Sheriff’s Office both requested more time to review their letters before responding to Boulder Reporting Lab’s questions. Both the city and county governments have defended sanctuary city policies in the past. 

Last May, county commissioners emphasized that the 10th Amendment “prevents the federal government from forcing states to use their own resources to enforce federal statutes, including immigration laws.”  

“If being a ‘sanctuary jurisdiction’ means that we support due process of law and human rights, then we are proud of that moniker,” the statement from commissioners reads.

Brooke Stephenson is a reporter for Boulder Reporting Lab, where she covers local government, housing, transportation, policing and more. Previously, she worked at ProPublica, and her reporting has been published by Carolina Public Press and Trail Runner Magazine. Most recently, she was the audience and engagement editor at Cardinal News, a nonprofit covering Southwest and Southside Virginia. Email: brooke@boulderreportinglab.org.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. Trump admin is trying to colonize Boulder. Have you noticed the huge American flag recently installed on the NIST building? And now this attempt to deny Boulder’s right to define its own policies. Trump knows Boulder is key to Dem wins in Colorado. So lets all stand up against the hateful, bigoted, culture warriors who are trying to destroy democracy.

  2. Local officials better obey immigration laws or pay the consequences. We don’t want Boulder to turn into Minneapolis or LA with wanton fighting in the streets with ICE officers. This does not have to be that big of a deal. During Obama ICE came here and made arrests. They cleaned out many local restaurants, construction companies and landscape firms. . Careful

    1. Jann,
      Did Obama’s immigration officers separate children from their parents? Throw people on the ground and handcuff them? Break into their houses without a warrant? Shoot through peoples doors and cars? Arrest citizens and throw them into prisons with no access to phones or lawyers? Send immigrants to horrific prisons and camps with no decent food, medical care, no trial, no bail, no lawyers, no habeas corpus? Deport them without due process to countries where they would be in danger for their lives, or countries where they had never lived before and had no family or friends? Jes’ askin’.

  3. Fat lot of good Polis’ pathetic capitulation to Trump did a few days ago. Did he think that would position Colorado well and prevent us from being further targeted? Is he on the side of the Trump regime here in ignoring federal court rulings since he’s all for ignoring state court convictions? He needs to stand up and fight back asap.

Leave a comment
Boulder Reporting Lab comments policy
All comments require an editor's review. BRL reserves the right to delete or turn off comments at any time. Please read our comments policy before commenting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *