The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) lab in Boulder is one of more than a dozen federal research facilities in the county. Credit: John Herrick

Federal workers in Boulder are feeling the impacts of the Trump administration’s decision to abruptly fire thousands of federal employees between Feb. 13 and 18 โ€” part of a sweeping effort that could eventually eliminate up to 200,000 jobs nationwide. 

Boulder County is home to more than a dozen federal research labs and roughly 1,700 direct federal employees, according to federal data, many of whom now face an uncertain future. Thousands more hold jobs tied to federal funding, from research to housing and human rights organizations. Some have already lost their jobs and are grappling with how to pay rent and provide for their families. Others are waiting anxiously to find out if they will be next. Exact numbers remain unclear.

One Boulder resident, who requested anonymity, said her husband was laid off from his job as a contractor with the U.S. Geological Survey.

โ€œThat was our main source of income,โ€ she said. โ€œWeโ€™ll just be on social security for now, and he’ll go back to applying for jobs endlessly.โ€ 

Others who responded to Boulder Reporting Labโ€™s anonymous survey voiced fears about supporting their families, affording housing and the long-term impact of losing skilled workers from their federal offices. 

Beyond individual workers, some fear layoffs could significantly impact Boulder’s economy, where federally funded labs employ more than 3,500 people, most of whom are not direct federal employees, according to the Boulder Chamber. These include NOAAโ€™s Space Weather Prediction Center, the National Centers for Environmental Information and Earth System Research Laboratory, the National Weather Service and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).

John Tayer, the Chamber’s president, called the layoffs โ€œunprecedentedโ€ in scale and impact. โ€œThat being said, we are closely monitoring what actually is moving through the federal system and which decisions are going to be final,โ€ he said.

The Chamber is analyzing the potential economic impact of these job cuts on Boulder and working to connect affected employees with job resources.

โ€œWe recognize that this could have a significant impact on the Boulder-area workforce and the important work these research facilities and federal departments are doing, both in our community and nationally,โ€ Tayer said.

At 11:30 a.m. on Wednesday, Feb. 19, a network of federal workers’ unions is planning a protest against these mass layoffs at the Department of Commerce building in Boulder. 

Meg Tilton, a developer at CIRES, the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at CU Boulder โ€” a partnership between CU and NOAA โ€” helped organize Boulderโ€™s protest. She said she’s doing so as a private citizen, not as a representative of either organization.

โ€œI used to work on NOAA projects and saw firsthand what important work they do,โ€ Tilton said, citing NOAAโ€™s efforts in monitoring air quality, forecasting space weather and maintaining environmental data records going back decades. โ€œFederal scientists and even long-term contractors at NOAA are scared theyโ€™ll lose their jobs.โ€

โ€œI have never organized a protest before, and doing so makes me nervous,โ€ Tilton said. โ€œBut I am really mad about what is happening to my friends who are feds.โ€

Inside the layoffs: A chaotic, sweeping effort to shrink the federal workforce

The layoffs โ€” framed by the administration as an effort to โ€œcut federal government waste, fraud and abuseโ€ โ€” have already eliminated an estimated 10,000 employees across multiple agencies, according to reports, with thousands more at risk.

Preliminary estimates suggest the cuts so far include:

According to the Washington Post, cutting government personnel by one-fourth would reduce federal spending by about 1%.

The layoffs primarily target federal probationary employees โ€” those in the first year of a new job, or two years in the case of military veterans and people with disabilities hired through special programs. The cuts have also impacted senior workers who recently changed roles or switched agencies, leaving some longtime public employees without jobs.  These employees have fewer protections and can be fired if they fail “to demonstrate his or her qualifications for continued employment.โ€

Many fired employees received emails citing poor performance, but many said they never received negative performance reviews before โ€” a claim backed by a federal lawsuit filed by workers alleging they were terminated solely because of their probationary status, not their job performance.  

The layoff process itself has been riddled with errors. Some termination letters had misspelled names, incorrect job titles or even missing agency names โ€” signs that the effort was rushed. In some cases, the administration has already asked workers to return, including nuclear safety employees and federal power grid operators in the Pacific Northwest, according to reports.

Ripple effects in Boulder beyond federal offices

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has offices in Boulder. Credit: John Herrick

The Trump administrationโ€™s broader effort to cut national spending will likely impact jobs beyond traditional federal government agencies. 

According to a preliminary analysis by the Chamber, about 12,000 people in Boulder work in jobs tied to the federal government, including roles in human rights, housing and research organizations that rely on federal funding.

Mary, who asked Boulder Reporting Lab not to use her last name to protect her husbandโ€™s identity, said she expects him to be fired from his job as a software engineer and scientist at CIRES, the research institute at CU Boulder.

CIRES studies climate, natural hazards and wildfire mitigation. Its work includes analyzing fire behavior, air quality impacts and climate-driven fire risks to improve forecasting, response and resilience.

At the start of the year, the institute believed it had funding secured for two to three years, according to Mary. Now, she said, her husbandโ€™s team is operating on a โ€œweek-to-week basis, learning if they continue to be funded.โ€

Maryโ€™s husband specializes in mapping and tracking natural resources, publishing essential data for researchers and the public. โ€œHe has chosen to stay in this job, despite being qualified for better-paying jobs in the private sector, because he cares deeply about the importance of this work for the public good,โ€ she said.

Meanwhile, wildland firefighting support services may also be affected. National news outlets report that the U.S. Forest Serviceโ€™s 10% staff cut could impact the agencyโ€™s fire prevention and mitigation efforts, including its collaboration with Boulder County on wildfire planning. 

Last summer, federal firefighters played a crucial role in containing the Stone Canyon and Lake Shore fires in Boulder County by providing rapid air support and additional resources. Their ability to quickly redirect aircraft and personnel helped prevent the fires from spreading further and causing even more destruction.

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the largest federal employee union, issued a statement pledging to fight these layoffs.  

“These firings are not about poor performance โ€” there is no evidence these employees were anything but dedicated public servants. They are about power,โ€ the AFGE statement read. 

โ€œEmployees were given no notice, no due process, and no opportunity to defend themselves in a blatant violation of the principles of fairness and merit that are supposed to govern federal employment.โ€

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management defended the cuts, saying they were made โ€œin support of the Presidentโ€™s broader efforts to restructure and streamline the federal government to better serve the American people at the highest possible standard.โ€

For many in Boulder, that reassurance means little.

“Itโ€™s really upsetting that the current administration is gutting important work like this,” Mary said. “It makes me very fearful for the future of our country.”


Do you have information to share or a personal story to tell about recent federal layoffs? Reach out to Brooke Stephenson at brooke@boulderreportinglab.org or take this anonymous survey:

Brooke Stephenson is a reporter for Boulder Reporting Lab, where she covers local government, housing, transportation, policing and more. Previously, she worked at ProPublica, and her reporting has been published by Carolina Public Press and Trail Runner Magazine. Most recently, she was the audience and engagement editor at Cardinal News, a nonprofit covering Southwest and Southside Virginia. Email: brooke@boulderreportinglab.org.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Think of the effect on CU. Guess we’ll no longer be a university town, nor will any other ones that are anchored on Fed Labs, Tech or medicine. I know of two health sciences complex proposals that passed Planning Board recently. It’s all a mess. Boulder eviscerated.

  2. Federal workers (and those researchers that depend on federal funding) are finally experiencing what it is like to have a job in the private sector. When a company can’t support it’s workforce without going bankrupt, they have a headcount reduction. Some people lose their jobs, and for them it may seem like the end of the world, but then they take their severance pay, put together their resume and get another job at an organization that is doing better financially than our federal government.

    To close the $1.82 trillion federal deficit, we would have to raise income taxes 75.3% (based on 2024 data from the US Treasury Department). Or, we can cut spending by 26.9% Which one of these options do you prefer? Our country is in a debt spiral. We have nearly doubled the size of government in the last 10 years, without a commensurate increase in incomes and tax revenues. It’s time to get real.

    1. I seem to recall that there are a few high-earners, many who are pretty cozy with the current president, who donโ€™t pay federal taxes *at all.* Maybe they could help close the gap?

    2. Richard,
      I would encourage you to dig into this a bit more. I am a researcher who was supported by federal grants up until last week. These grants are very competitive (<10% success rate), take hundreds of hours to develop and my compensation is far below the private sector. I do it because I find the work rewarding and it has produced a myriad of benefits in my field and far beyond. Not to mention that these grants are existing contracts with the federal government and funds from last years budget.

      My funds are being frozen to supposedly assess my projects for DEI, "wokeness" and things Trump doesn't like. So let's not pretend this is really about saving money. I'm all for having a conversation about what public support for science should be, but this isn't how that's really done in any sector.

      This is an attack on science and academia. At this point we're just throwing out the baby out with the bathwater.

      1. Agree. What does gender or ethnicity have to do with the substance of these gov’t contracts. NOTHING. This is such a waste, talking about “efficiency”.

  3. Richard start living in realityโ€”trump is dumping federal programs that directly benefit average Americans in order to give tax write offs to his billionaire buddies โ€” and increasing the deficit in the process.

    โ€œDespite DOGE, Trump’s agenda calls for adding trillions of dollars to U.S. debt
    Budget experts say Trumpโ€™s tax and spending priorities would increase red ink, even as he boasts of balancing the budget.

    Budget experts say that even if Trump succeeds at slashing the spending that his Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency is targeting โ€” like the U.S. Agency for International Development and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives governmentwide โ€” his policies would still substantially add to the deficit if they come to fruition.

    Trump has called for a series of steep tax cuts โ€” from extending his expiring 2017 tax law to eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits โ€” that would add at least $5 trillion to the 10-year deficit compared to the red ink if no changes are made to current federal law, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. That figure could rise to $11 trillion depending on how his so-far-ambiguous proposals are structured.

    โ€œItโ€™s rhetoric versus reality,โ€ said Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at CRFB, which calls for reducing red ink. โ€œAnd itโ€™s always popular to say, โ€˜Iโ€™m reducing the deficit.โ€™ And itโ€™s also popular to distribute a bunch of goodies, and this president is well known for that. So I donโ€™t think their rhetoric matches reality.โ€

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna191665

  4. and where the hell is Neguse? I’m extremely disappointed with our representatives and I will not be voting for them again. South Korean lawmakers woke up in the middle of the night to go barricade their offices to save their democracy and ours give up over a few emails. Quite frankly I would rather die than see my town taken over by DOGE goons.

Leave a comment
Boulder Reporting Lab comments policy
All comments require an editor's review. BRL reserves the right to delete or turn off comments at any time. Please read our comments policy before commenting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *